Heterogeneity, Sampling Correctness, and. Wir verwenden Cookies, um ein verbessertes Online- Erlebnis zu bieten und Ihnen speziell auf Sie zugeshnittene Inhalte und Dienstleistungen bereitzustellen. Mit der Nutzung von Dailymotion geben Sie uns Ihr Einverst. Pierre Gy's . This tribute covers a summary of Gy's professional career with a natural focus on TOS and its relationships to fundamental as well as applied sciences and technology, and why it is timely and fitting to present Pierre Gy with the tribute of WCSB1. Perspective. To put this tribute in perspective, I suggest a view of the situation in one “representative” discipline, which discovered the Theory of Sampling (TOS) only a relatively short time ago—and which is currently getting to grips with the reality that much of it's “data” may in fact have been generated by processes which are more or less in neglect of TOS. For heterogeneous materials, this is far from a trivial matter: from TOS' 5. Sampling of Particulate Materials Theory and Practice, 1st Edition from Pierre Gy. Theory and Practice reviews the theory and practice of sampling particulate solids. Pierre Gys Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice Free PDF. Pierre Gys Sampling Theory and Sampling. Gys Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice pdf provided. Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice. Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling. Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice, Second Edition: Heterogeneity, Sampling Correctness, and Statistical Process Control. Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice, Second Edition: Heterogeneity. Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice, Second Edition is a concise.
The Sampling Theory of Pierre Gy: Comparisons, Implementation, and Applications for Environmental Sampling Leon E.Struggling chemometrics. Chemometrics is barely 3. Difficult, because this new holistic type of data analysis apparently competed with the traditional and well- established discipline of statistics, which was not taken lightly, but frankly also because chemometrics rocked the boat too much in many complacent fields. Many scientists, also from other sciences than chemometrics, have experienced a similar struggle for recognition in their own career. Some have struggled much longer than others, perhaps up to a decade before a breakthrough occurred. A select few of the founding fathers and the first circles of pioneers within chemometrics have consistently contributed to the struggle for this “new discipline” for the last 2. Oftentimes, what kept us going was (only) the essential esprit de corps within the homeland of chemometrics. One can respectfully look to the present state of chemometrics with pride for all the efforts put in. At the end of the day when all these stories have been told, chemometricians have every reason to be very proud of what we have achieved. We can demonstrably point to the current healthy status and remarkable drive within our discipline. TOSConsider now a parallel story, only substitute chemometrics by sampling, the Theory of Sampling—and double the length of this period—not 2. Also, consider that you would have to do this work mainly on your own for most of this extended time. Pierre Gy tells his own scientific story behind TOS in part IV of his five- part series of contributions to the proceedings part of this Special Issue. Biography: Pierre Maurice Gy. Family: b. Paris, July 2. Felix and Clemence (Gourdain) Gy; m. Sylvia Duchesne, 1. Genevieve, Anne, Caroline. Education: Degree in Chem. Physics and Chemistry, 1. Ph. D Physics, U. Nancy, 1. 96. 0; Ph. D Math., U. Nancy, 1. Memberships: Mem. Mining and Metallurgy; N. Y. Sciences. Honours: Medal, Mining and Metall. Japan, 1. 95. 8; two gold medals Soc. Chemistry, 1. 99. Publications: 9 books; 1. Professional career: Chem. CMCF, Congo, 1. 94. Research Engr. Minerais and Metaux., Paris, 1. Head Mineral Processing Labs to Tech. Mgr., 1. 95. 2–1. Industrial Sampling and Blending Consultant, Cannes, 1. Founder: Internat. Sampling Inst., France. Avocations: Photography, mountain climbing. From SSC6 to WCSB1. Pierre Gy was originally invited as a special guest lecturer to SSC6 (the Sixth Scandinavian Symposium on Chemometrics) in August 1. While a contribution on the “Theory of Sampling” was planned for the SSC6 proceedings, it quickly transpired that it would not be possible to do anything even remotely close to the justice this science deserve with an average- length proceeding contribution (1. Thus, the idea of a more fundamental introduction to TOS in chemometrics and related data analysis sciences was born. The lack of knowledge of TOS in this and related scientific areas was simply too great. It was decided that now was the time to present a more comprehensive introduction. The First World Conference on Sampling and Blending, WCSB1 was the result. TOSA special situation now opened up. It was too much of a coincidence that TOS originated in 1. Soon, one idea followed the other, while the 5. TOS loomed large and suddenly very close. Knowing full well the intense workload involved, I nevertheless summoned up the courage to ask Pierre to write a new, updated introduction to the entire Theory of Sampling, complete with a comprehensive bibliography. The then 7. 5- year young gentleman initially balked somewhat at this suggestion, quite understandably, but after reconsidering the issue several times he came back with a scholarly opus in the form of a tutorial series which, instead of being published in the above 1. SSC6 proceedings, you will find occupying the leading place in this proceedings issue of WSCB1 (2. We owe Pierre a very great thank you for his willingness to undertake this hard work. The “autobiography” of TOSBut what originally appeared flat out impossible was to have Pierre write his own personal scientific history. Those who know him well also know that Pierre is a most generous and gracious man—he is willing to do almost anything to grant the wish of a fellow scientist or a friend. But ask him to talk of himself as a scientist and of his scientific achievements—this is where the “almost” comes in; this is where the story usually ends. He simply is extremely disinclined towards anything that even remotely perhaps could be viewed as “self- agrandissement”. Nevertheless, there was no end to the sweat and toil that went into trying to convince Pierre why Science (capital S) also needed such a biography of the originator of TOS.. Suffice to say that in the end the wish of the science community at large prevailed, and success for the editor came in the form of: “5. Sampling Theory—a personal history”. This is where Pierre tells his own scientific history of TOS within the convoluted industrial, academic, professional and personal web of his life. Fascinating is but a poor qualifier. Not many scientific disciplines have had the opportunity of a similar personal introduction to an oeuvre as monumental as that of Pierre Gy's—and TOS'—contribution to the field of science and technology. You will hopefully be greatly pleased also to read this contribution in this issue. The significance of TOSTOS is of the highest significance for all sciences, for technology and industry where proper sampling is on the agenda. Sadly, it has for most of its existence been largely overlooked in academia, if not totally neglected. This in no way has anything to do with the scientific content and/or the merit of TOS however, perhaps rather the opposite: For some, the mathematical language of TOS may appear somewhat difficult at first sight, while others only gradually will appreciate the full depth of the (very) practical sides of TOS, since it necessarily first must start out delineating the universal principles of correct, i. Apparently, for a select few, it may even be viewed almost as a personal affront that “data quality” (never much in focus since this usually is considered the responsibility of “other disciplines”) may in fact justifiably be subject to a fundamental TOS- questioning coupled with a call for greater sharing of the practical sampling responsibilities between analytical chemistry, process technology, data analysis, statistics and indeed also chemometrics. However, in the last 1. Pierre's own 1. 99. Wiley book: “Sampling for Analytical Purposes”, as well as the many current didactic efforts by an entire younger generation in this field (papers, books), have well begun to eliminate these stock objections to proper scientific attention to TOS. Today, there are relatively many types of courses taught on TOS, mostly by professional consultants and experts, but also in academia the situation now finally shows significant signs of change, even though there is much work to be done. Primary recognition for the important work of teaching sampling, TOS, within academia in general, within chemometrics and process technology in particular goes to the spearhead efforts of Pentti Minkkinen of Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland. He has almost completely single- handedly lifted the burden of starting teaching TOS at the university level for about 2. WCSB1 proceedings—also to be used outside chemometrics. WCSB1 and these proceedings can only be a relatively brief introduction to some of the most important reasons why the scientific community is finally presenting a fitting tribute to a singularly inspiring scientist's contributions—in the form of a conference dedicated exclusively to sampling. The proceedings from WCSB1 will also be used as a general introduction to the role of proper sampling within a much broader range of sciences and technological professions outside the comparatively narrow niche of chemometrics: analytical chemistry, mineral processing, process technology, engineering and technology, pharmaceutical—food, feedstock manufacturing, geology, geochemistry, clinical chemistry, medicine. The man behind TOSBefore focusing on the scientific achievements of WCSB1 in the rest of this Special Issue, this tribute also presents a few of Pierre's more personal attributes, some of which perhaps could be considered to fall outside the strict scope of science and TOS, but which are never- the- less important in giving a more comprehensive picture of the man behind TOS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |